In reply to @indelusionalizationary "why zig and not": I think in the end it's
up to you, and most of this will be speculation, but:

1. `zig` offers a more "manual" approach to memory management while still
offering good primitives to do so. This is particularly desirable when building
your kernel.
2. `nim` abstracts a lot, while `zig` abstracts as less as possible, this is not
necessarily bad, but when building an OS a lot of the time you want to know
exactly what's happening behind the curtains.
3. in OSDev you'll find yourself dealing with pointers a lot, I think `zig`'s
"star syntax ``" is closer to C and is a bit more natural. In `nim` you can of
course have pointers, but they feel "second class". That's ok, but maybe your
code will look cleaner with a just ``'s.

It's not really impossible nor bad to build something on either, but for me, I'd
choose `zig`.